Baltic Journal of Political Science 2019-03-19T18:57:33+02:00 Liutauras Gudžinskas Open Journal Systems <p>Founded in 2012. Dedicated to publishing&nbsp;articles on political theory, comparative politics, international&nbsp;relations and public policy with a focus on the states in the Baltic&nbsp;Sea region.</p> The Long Road from Neoliberalism to Neopopulism in ECE: The social paradox of neopopulism and decline of the Left 2019-03-19T18:56:30+02:00 Attila Ágh <p>[straipsnis ir santrauka anglų kalba]</p> 2018-12-28T00:00:00+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Vilniaus universiteto leidykla / Vilnius University Press Mars and Venus in Action? The US and EU’s foreign relations strategies in academic discourse 2019-03-19T18:56:26+02:00 Ieva Giedraityte <p>[straipsnis ir santrauka anglų kalba]</p> 2018-12-28T00:00:00+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Vilniaus universiteto leidykla / Vilnius University Press THE QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORMS IN POST-COMMUNIST COUNTRIES 2019-03-19T18:56:48+02:00 Vitalis Nakrošis <p>In this article we describe the adoption and execution of public administration reforms in Central and Eastern Europe between 2008 and 2013, as well as examine whether post-communist countries differ from other groups of European countries in terms of the substance of reforms and their implementation process. Instead of following popular Western administrative theoretical frames, we adopt the policy process approach. We focus on the role of policy actors during reform policymaking and implementation at the level of policy subsystems. More specifically, we employ the rational-comprehensive and garbage can perspectives to understand the reform processes in the post-communist region. Our research is based on the statistical analysis of survey data and two case studies of reforms initiated by the 2008-2012 Lithuanian government. The article concludes that countries in Central and Eastern Europe share some common characteristics: they focused on the issues of civil service and public or administrative services, their reform policy was often formulated on a top-down basis, and its execution often lacked adequate capacities. Despite a rational reform façade in these countries, the implementation of governance change appears to be quite erratic, as anticipated in the garbage can perspective. This can have negative consequences on the effectiveness of public policy, continuing to generate public distrust in post-communist state institutions.</p> 2018-02-12T14:20:48+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Baltic Journal of Political Science DECLINING SYSTEMIC TRUST IN THE POLITICAL ELITE IN THE EU’S NEW MEMBER STATES: THE DIVERGENCE BETWEEN EAST-CENTRAL EUROPE AND THE BALTIC STATES 2019-03-19T18:56:45+02:00 Attila Ágh <p>In the last decade there has been a process of rolling-back Europeanization efforts in the EU’s new member states (NMS), a process intensified by the global crisis. This de-Europeanization and de-democratization process in the NMS has become a significant part of a more general polycrisis in the EU. The backslide of democracy in the NMS as a topical issue has usually been analysed in terms of macro-politics, formal-legal state institutions, party systems, and macroeconomics. The most significant decline of democratization, however, is evident in the public’s decreasing participation in politics and in the eroding trust. This decline in systemic trust in political elites in the NMS has been largely neglected by analysts. Therefore, this paper concentrates on this relatively overlooked dimension of declining trust and social capital in the NMS. This analysis employs the concepts of governance, trust, and social capital to balance the usual formalistic top-down approach with a bottom-up approach that better illustrates the divergence between East-Central Europe and the Baltic states’ sub-regional development.</p> 2018-02-12T14:20:48+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Baltic Journal of Political Science INSIGHTS INTO INTRA-PARTY DECISION-MAKING IN LATVIA’S POLITICAL PARTIES 2019-03-19T18:56:41+02:00 Ilze Balcere <p>This article examines the decision–making processes within political parties in Latvia. Two important variables have been chosen for analysis: 1) policy formulation (which actors are involved in the elaboration of election programs), and 2) candidate selection (how parties create their electoral lists). A survey of Saeima (Latvia’s parliamentary body) deputies indicates that party board members have the most say in deciding which individuals to include on electoral lists and which policies to pursue; financial supporters seem to have almost no impact on parties’ internal decision-making processes.</p> 2018-02-12T14:20:48+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Baltic Journal of Political Science WHEN STATES LOSE TERRITORY: GEORGIA‘S POST-2008 ADJUSTMENT 2019-03-19T18:56:38+02:00 Dovilė Jakniūnaitė <p>In this article I analyse how Georgia, as a political entity, coped with the de facto loss of two of its territories: Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The process by which Georgia lost these territories started in early 1990 and reached its final phase in 2008 after the Georgian-Russian war. This article explores how Georgia adjusted to these losses without ever acknowledging its loss of the two territories, demonstrating a perfect example on how the normative territorial structure of an international system works. The analysis focuses on the crucial role of time in the process of the de facto territorial changes and examines how Georgia, in adapting to territorial losses and through its own actions, actually strengthened its separation from Abkhazia and South Ossetia.</p> 2018-02-12T14:20:48+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Baltic Journal of Political Science PARTY POSITIONS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE BALTIC STATES: DO THEY COMPETE? DO THEY MIRROR VOTERS’ POSITIONS? 2019-03-19T18:56:34+02:00 Tomas Bekišas <p>This paper aims to determine Lithuania’s, Latvia’s, and Estonia’s parties’ positions on the European Union (EU) and to ascertain whether these party positions mirror their voters’ positions on the EU. Analysis suggests that parties in this region have rather varied positions on the EU, with the exception of hard-Eurosceptic views, which are absent in Baltic states’ party systems. This paper also indicates that parties in the Baltic states tend to mirror, with some exceptions, their voters positions on the EU. This suggests that there may be additional factors determining parties’ positions regarding the EU in the Baltics.</p> 2018-02-12T14:20:48+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Baltic Journal of Political Science CALL FOR PAPERS 2018-02-12T14:26:31+02:00 Baltic Journal of Political Science 2017 6 ... 2018-02-12T14:20:48+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2018 Baltic Journal of Political Science RACE TO THE EUROZONE: WHY LATVIA JOINED BEFORE LITHUANIA 2019-03-19T18:57:33+02:00 Anastazija Markevičiūtė Vytautas Kuokštis <p> </p><p>Why did Latvia join the Eurozone in 2014, while Lithuania only acceded a year later? The two countries’ diverging experiences are surprising. Latvia suffered a more pronounced economic crisis from 2008 to 2010, which created greater euro adoption challenges in terms of meeting fiscal criteria. This article argues that, while the willingness to adopt the euro increased in both countries during and after the crisis, the will to seek euro adoption was stronger, clearer and more consistent in Latvia than in Lithuania. In examining this divergence, we argue that relying on aggregate economic costs and benefits, identity considerations, geopolitical considerations, societal support, and interest group preferences does not produce a satisfactory explanation of fluctuations in these countries’ willingness to adopt the euro. Instead, we propose that changes in this willingness can be traced to domestic political processes, such as the timing and results of elections and the magnitude of the economic crisis’s impact.</p> 2017-01-19T13:54:47+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2017 Baltic Journal of Political Science INCREASING EUPOPULISM AS A MEGATREND IN EAST CENTRAL EUROPE: FROM FACADE DEMOCRACIES TO VELVET DICTATORSHIPS 2019-03-19T18:57:26+02:00 Attila Ágh <p>Brexit and Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 US presidential election has launched a wave of discussions in the international media and political science literature on “authoritarian populism” and a “populist explosion.” Although this paper also reflects on this new wave of populism in the West, it concentrates on the connections between democracy’s decline and the so-called populist explosion in eastern central Europe (ECE) and closely investigates the Hungarian case within the context of ECE. This paper describes populism in ECE as a product of the transition from fading facade democracies to emerging velvet dictatorships. These velvet dictatorships rely on the soft power of media and communication rather on the hard power of state violence. Paradoxically, the ruling anti-elite populist parties have developed a system of populism from above, managed by the new politico-business elite. Populism (social and national) and Euroscepticism are the two most basic, and twin, terms used to describe these new (semi)authoritarian regimes. Populism and Euroscepticism are convertible; they are two sides of the same coin as they express the same divergence from the EU mainstream. Therefore, this paper introduces the term: Eupopulism.<br /><br /></p> 2017-01-19T13:54:47+02:00 Autorinės teisės (c) 2017 Baltic Journal of Political Science