Neurologijos seminarai ISSN ISSN 1392-3064 / eISSN 2424-5917

2025, 29(103), pp. 5–14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/NS.2025.29.103.1

Apžvalginis mokslinis straipsnis / Review Article

Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Therapeutic Modality for Treatment-Refractory Cerebellar Tremor and Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Current Evidence

Rida Bashir*
Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Ammar Arshad
Rahbar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

Mudasar Nasir
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Naeem Akhtar
Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

Areeba Ishtiaq
Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan

Rabia Javed
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Shumaim Ijaz
Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

Washma Khan
Shalamar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract. For patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has become a cutting-edge therapeutic strategy for treating treatment-refractory cerebellar tremor and dysphagia. This study assesses available data demonstrating the effectiveness of VNS in reducing these incapacitating symptoms, which significantly impact patients’ quality of life. Research indicates that VNS can lead to substantial improvements in dysphagia and cerebellar tremors within two to three months of therapy initiation. Primary outcomes include a reduced severity of symptoms and an enhanced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although VNS presents fewer risks than traditional treatments, potential complications exist. Overall, VNS shows promise as an adjunctive therapy for managing dysphagia and cerebellar tremors in MS patients; further research is necessary to explore its long-term effects and applications in other neurological conditions.
Keywords: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), dysphagia, cerebellar tremor, multiple sclerosis (MS).

Klajoklio nervo stimuliacija gydant atsparų smegenėlių tremorą ir disfagiją sergant išsėtine skleroze: dabartinių įrodymų apžvalga

Santrauka. Išsėtine skleroze sergantiems pacientams klajoklio nervo stimuliacija (KNS) tampa pažangia gydymo strategija, skirta gydyti sunkiai valdomą tremorą ir disfagiją. Šiame straipsnyje aptariami duomenys, įrodantys KNS veiksmingumą mažinant šiuos negalią sukeliančius simptomus, reikšmingai bloginančius pacientų gyvenimo kokybę. Tyrimai rodo, kad KNS gali žymiai pagerinti disfagiją ir tremorą per du–tris mėnesius nuo gydymo pradžios, todėl yra perspektyvi papildoma terapija disfagijos ir smegenėlių drebulio gydymui MS pacientams. Visgi reikalingi tolesni tyrimai, siekiant ištirti jos ilgalaikius poveikius ir pritaikymą kitoms neurologinėms ligoms.
Raktažodžiai: klajoklio nervo stimuliacija, disfagija, smegenėlių tremoras, išsėtinė sklerozė.

_________

* Corresponding author. Rida Bashir, Research Associate, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore Pakistan. E-mail: rida.bashir556@gmail.com

Received: 24/12/2024. Accepted: 01/04/2025
Copyright © Rida Bashir, Ammar Arshad, Mudasar Nasir, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Naeem Akhtar, Areeba Ishtiaq, Rabia Javed, Shumaim Ijaz, Washma Khan, 2025
. Published by Vilnius University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by demyelination, driven by two primary pathogenetic mechanisms: inflammation and degeneration [1]. Inflammation is primarily associated with acute episodes of neurological dysfunction relapses and the formation of focal demyelinating lesions in the brain and spinal cord [2]. Degeneration, on the other hand, is chiefly responsible for the progression of disability [3].

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS), resulting in altered nerve conduction due to damage to CNS resident cells, primarily oligodendrocytes and neurons. CD4+ T cells play a crucial role in the immune cascades that cause tissue damage, but CD8+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, and antibodies also contribute to this damage. Additionally, the innate immune response, particularly involving microglial cells, is involved in the development of lesions [4,5].

It is characterized by myelin loss, axonal damage, and involvement of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) throughout its course [6]. Common ANS disorders in MS patients, which significantly reduce their quality of life, include sweat disorders, urinary issues, orthostatic hypotension, gastrointestinal symptoms, and sexual dysfunction [7].

Various drugs, including natalizumab, ofatumumab, oral steroids, and immunosuppressive agents, are used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis to prevent relapses. However, the progression of MS continues to negatively impact patients’ lives, with only symptomatic treatments available and no definitive cure having been discovered yet. Additionally, the chronic accumulation of immune cells behind the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can contribute to resistance to therapeutic approaches [8,9].

Given the involvement of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), the main brainstem visceral component of the vagus nerve, in modulating central pattern generators (CPGs) associated with both the olive complex pathway and swallowing, improvement is likely related to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) [10]. The results suggest that VNS could have additional therapeutic applications, potentially representing a novel treatment approach for patients with severe conditions.

The VNS therapy system consists of a pulse generator, a bipolar VNS lead, a programming wand with corresponding software for a handheld computer, a tunneling tool, and handheld magnets. The generator sends electrical signals to the vagus nerve via the lead [11].

Individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders often show a reduced vagal tone, and research indicates that VNS can help address this insufficient vagal response [12]. Numerous studies have also reported significant improvements in the quality of life for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders following VNS therapy [13].

Background

Therapy in the Past

The course of development of the treatment of multiple sclerosis is a long one. The drug treatment is usually of the relapse, preventive and symptomatic type. Relapse treatment is the type of treatment that is selected after a subacute event or in the case of worsening of preexisting symptoms [14]. The usual treatment is the IV infusion of 1000 mg corticosteroids per day over the course of 3–5 days that is then followed by oral steroids. The main goal of this treatment is to hasten the course of remission. Common side effects are dyspepsia and sleep difficulty. Comparison between IV and oral steroid was a topic of debate in the past, but currently, it has already been established that IV steroid administration is more useful for the management of an acute attack of MS rather than oral administration (High-Dose Intravenous Corticosteroid, n.d.) [15]. Preventive care on the other hand is given to reduce the frequency of future attacks and reduce disability in the long run. The first line treatment is interferon beta [betaferone, extavia, rebif (subcutaneous) and Avonex (intramuscularly)] and glatiramer acetate (copaxone as a daily subcutaneous injection). Interferon beta results in few flu- like side effects. Glatiramer acetate results in self-limiting and harmless symptoms of flushing, tachycardia and dyspnea [16]. Certain cohort studies have shown a significantly lower 2-year risk of relapse in patients on glatiramer acetate in the long run. Second line treatment with drugs like natalizumab is indicated in cases of a repeated relapse despite the first line preventive treatment with interferon beta and GA [17]. The IV administration of this drug every 4 weeks is associated with a decrease in the relapse rate by 70% and a reduction in the risk of permanent functional impairment by 40–50%; however, severe side effects associated with the long-term use of this drug limit its usefulness [18]. Viral encephalopathy, progressive multi focal leukoencephalopathy and rare but fatal infections with JC virus limit its use for long-term prevention. Continuous screening is recommended with its use. Third line treatment with mitoxantrones can be considered in repeated relapses or in the cases of progressive disease [19]. The drug, despite having beneficial effects in preventing further relapses and permanent functional impairment, involves severe side effects such as cardiotoxicity, myelosuppression, leukemia and leukopenia – these are the major hurdles in its long-term use.

Medical Therapy for Cerebellar Tremor and Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis

VNS has emerged as a promising therapeutic modality for managing treatment-refractory cerebellar tremors and dysphagia in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in both symptoms following VNS treatment [20]. In a study by Marrosu et al., VNS was found to improve postural cerebellar tremor (PCT) and dysphagia in three MS patients. The tremor improved by 67% on a disability rating scale, and water intake and ‘piecemeal’ deglutition improved by 65% and 78%, respectively, over a period of two to three months [21]. These improvements persisted during a 26-month follow-up period. The mechanism behind the impact of VNS on cerebellar tremors and dysphagia is thought to be related to the involvement of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), a key brainstem component of the vagus nerve [22]. The NTS modulates central pattern generators linked to both the olive complex pathway and swallowing, which likely contributes to the observed improvements. VNS has also been shown to inhibit harmaline-induced tremor, further supporting its potential as a therapeutic approach for cerebellar tremors. The results of these studies suggest that VNS may be a valuable adjunctive treatment for managing cerebellar tremors and dysphagia in MS patients who have not responded to other therapies [23]. Overall, VNS offers a novel and potentially effective medical therapy for managing treatment-refractory cerebellar tremors and dysphagia in MS patients. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the effects of VNS on these symptoms and to explore its potential applications in other neurological disorders [24].

Possible Outcomes

1. Primary outcomes

Reduced Cerebellar Tremor Severity

VNS therapy is very helpful in patients displaying Postural cerebellar tremors. VNS therapy becomes a potential approach when tremors cannot be controlled by medication [25]. It reduces the severity of cerebellar tremors in patients of Multiple sclerosis. According to a study, VNS therapy was performed in three Multiple sclerosis patients displaying Postural cerebellar tremors (PCT). All three patients manifested improvement within two to three weeks [26]. Another study found that high-frequency VNS led to least 50% reduction in tremors frequency, whereas low-frequency VNS also led to a 50% reduction in tremors frequency, but it takes more time to achieve the desired outcome [27].

Improved Dysphagia Severity

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has shown significant promise in improving dysphagia severity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who exhibit postural cerebellar tremor (PCT) and dysphagia. Studies have consistently demonstrated that VNS can lead to substantial improvements in the swallowing function, particularly for thin liquids, within a period of two to three months following treatment initiation. In a study by Marrosu et al., VNS was found to improve dysphagia in all subjects during the follow-up period, as measured by a swallowing speed test [21]. However, difficulties in swallowing solids did not show significant improvement. This suggests that VNS may have a more pronounced effect on the swallowing of liquids, which is crucial for maintaining adequate nutrition and hydration. The mechanism behind VNS’s impact on dysphagia is thought to be related to the involvement of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), a key brainstem component of the vagus nerve. NTS plays a critical role in modulating central pattern generators linked to both the olive complex pathway and swallowing. This modulation likely contributes to the observed improvements in dysphagia following VNS [28].

These findings are significant, as dysphagia is a common and debilitating symptom in MS patients, often leading to malnutrition, aspiration, and a decreased quality of life. The use of VNS as a therapeutic modality offers a novel and potentially effective approach to managing dysphagia in this population. Further research is still needed to fully elucidate the effects of VNS on dysphagia and to explore its potential applications in other neurological disorders [29].

2. Secondary Outcomes

Enhanced Quality of Life in MS Patients

Multiple sclerosis (MS) can be a life-altering condition, especially when new symptoms appear or old ones worsen for more than 48 hours – which is commonly known as a relapse. These relapses often lead to increased care needs and can deeply affect a patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL reflects not only the physical but also the emotional and social challenges that people with MS are facing. It can be thought of as a way to quantify the overall impact of MS on a person’s well-being, from mobility issues to mental health struggles [29,30]. Health state utilities (HSUs) are often used to measure this impact, ranging from ‘0’ (representing death) to ‘1’ (perfect health). Several tools have been developed to help measure these HSUs, including the widely used EQ-5D and AQoL-8D. EQ-5D, for instance, asks patients to rate their difficulties across five domains, specifically, mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. These ratings help create a picture of the patient’s health state and allow for comparisons over time or between groups. Similarly, AQoL-8D looks deeper into psychosocial dimensions such as mental health, self-worth, and happiness, alongside physical measures [31]. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) are a way to combine these measurements of HRQoL with the length of a person’s life, thus providing a comprehensive view of the value of medical treatments. In MS, where relapses can cause significant shifts in health, perception how these relapses affect a person’s quality of life is essential for planning effective treatments. A recent health economic model study found that the disability severity and the MS type are sensitive discriminators for relapse disutility [32]. The optimal allocation of scarce healthcare resources can be facilitated by reducing ambiguity in identifying interventions via input parameters in future multistate health economic models. Apart from that, disutility points towards a decrease in health state utility (HSU) due to a specific symptom or complication and can be determined by calculating the crude and adjusted mean differences in HSUs of the patients encountering the symptoms of relapse [33].

By considering both the length and quality of life, healthcare providers can make informed decisions about allocating resources and tailoring treatments to improve outcomes for patients with MS. Reducing uncertainties in these measurements can also help in future research to ensure cost-effective health interventions are being used, ultimately improving the quality of life for those living with MS – whether they experience mild or severe disability.

Changes in Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

The vagus nerve is responsible for the parasympathetic innervation of the major thoracic and abdominal organs [34]. Recently, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been investigated as a therapeutic for a multitude of diseases, such as treatment-resistant epilepsy, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and asthma [35]. The vagus nerve and its possible role in (therapy of) many diseases has stirred interest from many sides. The simplest handle to view its activity has, for a long time, been the variability of the heart rate [36]. Measurements of HRV include the time domain, frequency domain methods, and so on [37]. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates central and peripheral neurophysiology. Specifically, taVNS increases heart rate variability (HRV), thus indicating a shift in the autonomic function towards parasympathetic predominance [38]. RMSSD, as a measure of high-frequency heart rate variability, was inversely correlated with the SUDEP-7 score, r = -0.64, p = 0.004. Subjects with higher SUDEP-7 scores had reduced levels of heart rate variability (RMSSD). Lower RMSSD values were associated with higher risk scores on the new SUDEP risk inventory. This provides new evidence that HRV (specifically, RMSSD) is a marker of SUDEP risk. Other time-dependent measures of HRV (SDNN, SDANN) were not significantly correlated with SUDEP risk scores [39]. No consistent changes in HRV could be found as a result of acute (10 min) or prolonged (1 h) transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation. However, it seems that right t-VNS stimulation has more effects on HRV, and changes could be found more consistently in women than in men [40]. Although active-taVNS and sham-taVNS stimulation did not differ in subjective intensity ratings, the active stimulation of the cymba led to vagally mediated HRV increases in both the time and frequency domains. Differences were significant between active-taVNS and both sham-taVNS and resting conditions in the absence of stimulation for various HRV parameters, but not for the low-frequency index of HRV, where no differences were found between active-taVNS and sham-taVNS conditions [41]. The mechanism of the way how VNS reduces the seizure burden does not appear to be significantly related to alterations in the baseline heart rate variability. However, the subtlety of sympathetic/parasympathetic signaling likely requires a more structured approach to experimental and analytic techniques than the body of knowledge currently found in the literature [42]. The results in the literature were mixed, which may be mainly attributable to the heterogeneity of the study designs and stimulation delivery dosages [43].

Adverse Events Associated with VNS Therapy

Vagus nerve stimulation is a relatively safer option of treatment in multiple sclerosis and has appreciably fewer side effects as compared to immunosuppressive drug regimen, but it can still result in many complications and thus associated morbidity. Complications can be early (related to surgery) and late (related to the device and stimulation of vagus nerve) [44]. Intraoperative complications are bradycardia and asystole during lead impedance testing. Expected technical complications during the surgery are an electrode fracture, dislocation and generation malfunction with a slightly higher complication rate in young children that is assumed due to the growth during adolescence [45]. There is extensive evidence that many technical issues arising during surgery such as disconnection, electrode fracture, hardware failure or tissue scarring result in high lead impedance that ultimately requires a revision of surgery [46]. Immediate post-operative complications include peritracheal hematoma and infections. One of the more anticipated complications is vagus nerve injury resulting in left vocal cord paralysis that is followed by dyspnea, dysphagia, and hoarseness. Some late post-operative complications are arrhythmias, obstructive sleep apnea, tonsillar pain, and phrenic nerve stimulation. One of the more impactful complications is infection. Infections after VNS device implantation are difficult to manage; they usually result in complete hardware removal with lead salvation, systemic antibiotic therapy and subsequent reimplantation of the device after the resolution of the infection [47]. Side effects are mostly related to the ‘on’-phase of stimulation; these side effects, too, tend to diminish with time, and are often resolvable. Most of these sets of complications are associated with the invasive technique of VNS device implantation. Newer non-invasive VNS delivery systems are free from surgery and permit patient-administered stimulation on demand. These non-invasive VNS systems are rather safer and more tolerable, which results in fewer complications.

Improvement in Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis

Cerebellar white matter lesions resulting in cerebellar impairment are frequently observed on MRIs in patients with multiple sclerosis. Depending on the exact location of the lesion, cerebellar disease can cause limb, gait, and truncal ataxia in addition to other cerebellar symptoms such as gaze-evoked nystagmus, dysarthria, and tremor. Studies conducted by Scott E. Krahl revealed that cervical vagus nerve stimulation can reduce harmaline-induced tremors by 40% when compared to sham VNS (inactive VNS) [48]. These tremors are comparable to intention tremors involving cerebellar circuits. Furthermore, VNS has been shown to increase the firing rate of the Locus ceruleus, a structure injured in MS, resulting in a fall in nor-adrenaline levels, which has a significant anti-inflammatory effect on neurons, exacerbating the condition [49]. Due to the fact that the pathophysiology and microcircuits involved in causing PCT are unknown, more research is needed in this area. There is also a great need to improve therapeutic options for symptomatic treatments of cerebellar symptoms and to provide neuroprotection within the cerebellum.

Comparison Table of Treatment Modalities

Discussion

The results of studies on the use of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) to cure dysphagia and cerebellar tremor in MS patients initiate an important conversation on the possible use of VNS in the management of these crippling symptoms. Innovative advancements to MS treatment are necessary, as VNS has become an appealing alternative for individuals who have not reacted well to traditional medications [50]. Research suggests that VNS can result in significant improvements to the degree of tremor and swallowing function. Within a few months of starting the therapy, studies have shown significant improvements in dysphagia and decreases in the tremor severity of up to 67%. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of VNS while also shedding light on its underlying mechanisms, namely, the extent to which it affects the nucleus tractus solitaries [51].

These advancements have a substantial positive influence on MS patients’ quality of life, going beyond only symptom treatment. Effective management of dysphagia is essential because it poses major health risks and frequently results in malnutrition and aspiration. VNS treatment may reduce these risks by enhancing swallowing function, enabling patients to keep up an improved diet and hydration. This component is especially important because multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by a range of symptoms that can significantly impair everyday functioning and general well-being [52,53].

Though the results are encouraging, yet they also bring up significant concerns regarding the safety and long-term implications of the VNS therapy. While adverse effects are often lower than with conventional immunosuppressive medications, issues with surgical implantation and malfunctioning devices are always a problem [54]. In addition to late consequences like infections or vagus nerve injury, early complications like bradycardia or intraoperative problems can also occur. A potential remedy for these problems is the development of non-invasive VNS systems, which enable patient-administered stimulation without the dangers of surgery [55].

Conclusion

For people with multiple sclerosis with treatment-refractory cerebellar tremors and dysphagia, VNS offers a novel therapeutic option. Clinical investigations have shown significant gains, which highlights the potential offered by this treatment when used as an adjuvant. VNS may become more crucial in improving the quality of life for those with multiple sclerosis as research into its processes and treatment regimens advances. This could lead to more all-encompassing approaches towards managing this complicated illness.

References:

  1. Papiri G, D’Andreamatteo G, Cacchiò G, Alia S, Silvestrini M, Paci C, Luzzi S, Vignini A. Multiple sclerosis: Inflammatory and neuroglial aspects. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45(2): 1443–70. doi: 10.3390/cimb45020094
  2. Höftberger R, Lassmann H. Inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol 2017; 145: 263–83. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802395-2.00019-5
  3. Stahl A. The diagnosis and treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117(29–30): 513–20. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0513
  4. Weissert R. The immune pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2013; 8(4): 857–66. doi: 10.1007/s11481-013-9467-3
  5. Wekerle H, Lassmann H. The immunology of inflammatory demyelinating disease. McAlpine’s Multiple Sclerosis 2006: 491–555. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-07271-0.50013-6
  6. Pintér A, Cseh D, Sárközi A, Illigens BM, Siepmann T. Autonomic dysregulation in multiple sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16(8): 16920–52. doi: 10.3390/ijms160816920
  7. Haines JD, Inglese M, Casaccia P. Axonal damage in multiple sclerosis. Mt Sinai J Med 2011; 78(2): 231–43. doi: 10.1002/msj.20246
  8. Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Ridley B, Minozzi S, Del Giovane C, Peryer G, Piggott T, Foschi M, Filippini G, Tramacere I, Baldin E, Nonino F. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1(1): CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3
  9. Talanki Manjunatha R, Habib S, Sangaraju SL, Yepez D, Grandes XA. Multiple sclerosis: Therapeutic strategies on the horizon. Cureus 2022; 14(5): e24895. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24895
  10. Marrosu F, Maleci A, Cocco E, Puligheddu M, Barberini L, Marrosu MG. Vagal nerve stimulation improves cerebellar tremor and dysphagia in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2007; 13(9): 1200–2. doi: 10.1177/1352458507078399
  11. Afra P, Adamolekun B, Aydemir S, Watson GDR. Evolution of the vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy system technology for drug-resistant epilepsy. Front Med Technol 2021; 3: 696543. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.696543
  12. Engineer CT, Hays SA, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation as a potential adjuvant to behavioral therapy for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. J Neurodev Disord 2017; 9: 20. doi: 10.1186/s11689-017-9203-z
  13. Manning KE, Beresford-Webb JA, Aman LCS, Ring HA, Watson PC, Porges SW, Oliver C, Jennings SR, Holland AJ. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS): A novel effective treatment for temper outbursts in adults with Prader-Willi Syndrome indicated by results from a non-blind study. PLoS One 2019; 14(12): e0223750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223750
  14. Ramo-Tello C, Blanco Y, Brieva L, Casanova B, Martínez-Cáceres E, Ontaneda D, Ramió-Torrentá L, Rovira À. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. J Pers Me 2021; 12(1): 6. doi: 10.3390/jpm12010006
  15. Sellebjerg F, Barnes D, Filippini G, Midgard R, Montalban X, Rieckmann P, Selmaj K, Visser LH, Sørensen PS; EFNS Task Force on Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Relapses. EFNS guideline on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: Report of an EFNS task force on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12(12): 939–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01352.x
  16. La Mantia L, Di Pietrantonj C, Rovaris M, Rigon G, Frau S, Berardo F, Gandini A, Longobardi A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Vaona A. Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11(11): CD009333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009333.pub3
  17. Fernández O. Clinical utility of glatiramer acetate in the management of relapse frequency in multiple sclerosis. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2012; 4: 117–33. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S8755
  18. Pardo G, Jones DE. The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Safety and immunologic considerations. J Neurol 2017; 264(12): 2351–74. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8594-9. Erratum in: J Neurol 2017; 264(12): 2375–7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8633-6
  19. Cortese I, Reich DS, Nath A. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and the spectrum of JC virus-related disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17(1): 37–51. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00427-y
  20. Geny C, Nguyen JP, Pollin B, Feve A, Ricolfi F, Cesaro P, Degos JD. Improvement of severe postural cerebellar tremor in multiple sclerosis by chronic thalamic stimulation. Mov Disord 1996; 11(5): 489–94. doi: 10.1002/mds.870110503
  21. Marrosu F, Maleci A, Cocco E, Puligheddu M, Marrosu MG. Vagal nerve stimulation effects on cerebellar tremor in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005; 65(3): 490. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172343.45110.79
  22. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Bossuyt PM, Bonsel GJ, van Someren EJ, de Bie RM, Merkus MP, Speelman JD. A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(7): 461–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002173420703
  23. Kosmowska B, Wardas J. The pathophysiology and treatment of essential tremor: The role of adenosine and dopamine receptors in animal models. Biomolecules 2021; 11(12): 1813. doi: 10.3390/biom11121813
  24. Cheng K, Wang Z, Bai J, Xiong J, Chen J, Ni J. Research advances in the application of vagus nerve electrical stimulation in ischemic stroke. Front Neurosci 2022; 16: 1043446. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1043446
  25. Menekseoglu AK, Korkmaz MD, Is EE, Basoglu C, Ozden AV. Acute effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on hand tremor in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot study of case series. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2023; 57(4): 513–9. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2023.77200
  26. Makhoul K, Ahdab R, Riachi N, Chalah MA, Ayache SS. Tremor in multiple sclerosis–an overview and future perspectives. Brain Sci 2020; 10(10): 722. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100722
  27. Fan JJ, Shan W, Wu JP, Wang Q. Research progress of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy. CNS Neurosci Ther 2019; 25(11): 1222–8. doi: 10.1111/cns.13209
  28. Olsen LK, Solis E Jr, McIntire LK, Hatcher-Solis CN. Vagus nerve stimulation: Mechanisms and factors involved in memory enhancement. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17: 1152064. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1152064
  29. Cooper CM, Farrand AQ, Andresen MC, Beaumont E. Vagus nerve stimulation activates nucleus of solitary tract neurons via supramedullary pathways. J Physiol 2021; 599(23): 5261–79. doi: 10.1113/JP282064
  30. Ellrich J. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 36(6): 437–42. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000576
  31. He W, Jing XH, Zhu B, Zhu XL, Li L, Bai WZ, Ben H. The auriculo-vagal afferent pathway and its role in seizure suppression in rats. BMC Neurosci 2013; 14: 85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-85
  32. Prieto L, Sacristán JA. Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 80. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-80
  33. Grover S, McClelland A, Furnham A. Preferences for scarce medical resource allocation: Differences between experts and the general public and implications for the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol 2020; 25(4): 889–901. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12439
  34. Garamendi-Ruiz I, Gómez-Esteban JC. Cardiovascular autonomic effects of vagus nerve stimulation. Clin Auton Res 2019; 29(2): 183–94. doi: 10.1007/s10286-017-0477-8
  35. Capilupi MJ, Kerath SM, Becker LB. Vagus nerve stimulation and the cardiovascular system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020; 10(2): a034173. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a034173
  36. Karemaker JM. How the vagus nerve produces beat-to-beat heart rate variability; experiments in rabbits to mimic in vivo vagal patterns. J Clin Transl Res 2015; 1(3): 190–204.
  37. Claiborne A, Williams A, Jolly C, Isler C, Newton E, May L, George S. Methods for analyzing infant heart rate variability: A preliminary study. Birth Defects Res 2023; 115(10): 998–1006. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2177
  38. Machetanz K, Berelidze L, Guggenberger R, Gharabaghi A. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and heart rate variability: Analysis of parameters and targets. Auton Neurosci 2021; 236: 102894. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102894
  39. DeGiorgio CM, Miller P, Meymandi S, Chin A, Epps J, Gordon S, Gornbein J, Harper RM. RMSSD, a measure of vagus-mediated heart rate variability, is associated with risk factors for SUDEP: The SUDEP-7 Inventory. Epilepsy Behav 2010; 19(1): 78–81. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.011
  40. De Couck M, Cserjesi R, Caers R, Zijlstra WP, Widjaja D, Wolf N, Luminet O, Ellrich J, Gidron Y. Effects of short and prolonged transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate variability in healthy subjects. Auton Neurosci 2017; 203: 88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.11.003
  41. Constantinescu V, Matei D, Constantinescu I, Cuciureanu DI. Heart rate variability and vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy patients. Transl Neurosci 2019; 10: 223–32. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2019-0036
  42. Wessel CR, Karakas C, Haneef Z, Mutchnick I. Vagus nerve stimulation and heart rate variability: A scoping review of a somatic oscillatory signal. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 160: 95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.02.011
  43. Soltani D, Azizi B, Sima S, Tavakoli K, Hosseini Mohammadi NS, Vahabie AH, Akbarzadeh-Sherbaf K, Vasheghani-Farahani A. A systematic review of the effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in healthy subjects. Clin Auton Res 2023; 33(2): 165–89. doi: 10.1007/s10286-023-00938-w
  44. Natarajan C, Le LHD, Gunasekaran M, Tracey KJ, Chernoff D, Levine YA. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve ameliorates inflammation and disease activity in a rat EAE model of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121(28): e2322577121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322577121
  45. Milman A, Nof E, Rav Acha M, Beinart R, Kutyifa V, Merkely B, Regev E, Biffi M, Cha YM, Ovdat T, Klempfner R, Glikson M. Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: The Simpler trial. Europace 2023; 25(3): 956–60. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac282
  46. Entezami P, German JW, Adamo MA. High lead impedances requiring revision during vagal nerve stimulator generator replacement. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163(5): 1365–8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04585-2
  47. Wozniak SE, Thompson EM, Selden NR. Vagal nerve stimulator infection: A lead-salvage protocol. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7(6): 671–5. doi: 10.3171/2011.4.PEDS10556
  48. Krahl SE, Martin FC, Handforth A. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits harmaline-induced tremor. Brain Res 2004; 1011(1): 135–8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.03.021
  49. Zakaria R, Lenz FA, Hua S, Avin BH, Liu CC, Mari Z. Thalamic physiology of intentional essential tremor is more like cerebellar tremor than postural essential tremor. Brain Res 2013; 1529: 188–99. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.011
  50. Goggins E, Mitani S, Tanaka S. Clinical perspectives on vagus nerve stimulation: Present and future. Clin Sci (Lond) 2022; 136(9): 695–709. doi: 10.1042/CS20210507
  51. Florie MGMH, Pilz W, Dijkman RH, Kremer B, Wiersma A, Winkens B, Baijens LWJ. The effect of cranial nerve stimulation on swallowing: A systematic review. Dysphagia 2021; 36(2): 216–30. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10126-x
  52. Ansari NN, Tarameshlu M, Ghelichi L. Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: Diagnostic and evaluation strategies. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis 2020; 10: 15–28. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S198659
  53. Cheng I, Hamad A, Sasegbon A, Hamdy S. Advances in the treatment of dysphagia in neurological disorders: A review of current evidence and future considerations. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2022; 18: 2251–63. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S371624
  54. Ben-Menachem E. Vagus nerve stimulation, side effects, and long-term safety. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 18(5): 415–8. doi: 10.1097/00004691-200109000-00005
  55. Goggins E, Mitani S, Tanaka S. Clinical perspectives on vagus nerve stimulation: Present and future. Clin Sci (Lond) 2022; 136(9): 695–709. doi: 10.1042/CS20210507