Automated Deep Learning Based Cardiac Quantification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Comparative Study with Manual Segmentation
Research papers
Shivam Angiras
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3575-859X
Deb Kumar Boruah
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-135X
Pranjal Phukan
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
Kalyan Sarma
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
Prince Das
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-4145
Rajeev Bharadwaj
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-4181
Harshit Jain
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
Ajmal Roshan
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Guwahati image/svg+xml
Published 2025-08-11
https://doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2025.32.2.8
PDF
HTML

Keywords

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
deep learning
cardiac MRI
mitral regurgitation
automated segmentation
left ventricular function

How to Cite

1.
Angiras S, Boruah DK, Phukan P, et al. Automated Deep Learning Based Cardiac Quantification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Comparative Study with Manual Segmentation. AML. 2025;32(2):8. doi:10.15388/Amed.2025.32.2.8

Abstract

Background: Hypertrophic CardioMyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent inherited cardiac disorder, where accurate assessment of Left Ventricular (LV) function and Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is crucial. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging is considered the gold standard for evaluating these parameters. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) algorithms have emerged to automate cardiac quantification, but their performance in complex pathologies such as HCM still requires validation.
Purpose: To compare the performance of a fully automated deep learning-based cardiac segmentation software (SW 2) (SuiteHEART) with conventional manual segmentation (SW 1) (syngo.Via) for quantifying crucial cardiac parameters in patients with HCM.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 25 consecutive adult patients (mean age 49±12 years) with HCM referred for CMR at our institute were included. CMR examinations were performed by using a 3.0 Tesla scanner (Siemens Vida). The key parameters assessed included Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), End-Diastolic Volume (LVEDV), Stroke Volume (LVSV), Aortic Forward Flow (AoF), Mitral Regurgitation (MR), and Pressure Gradient (PG) across the LVOT. Manual and automated segmentations were performed by using syngo.Via (SW 1) and SuiteHEART software (SW 2), respectively. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests, linear regression, and Bland–Altman analysis.
Results: There was a strong correlation between DL-based and manual measurements for LVEF (r=0.91), LVEDV (r=0.89), LVSV (r=0.87), AoF (r=0.86), MR (r=0.84), and PG (r=0.81) (all p<0.001). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated acceptable limits of agreement, with no significant bias. Automated segmentation significantly reduced post-processing time compared to manual methods (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Fully automated DL-based cardiac quantification provides accurate and reproducible assessment of the LV function, MR, and flow parameters in HCM patients, closely matching manual segmentation results. Incorporation of DL algorithms can substantially streamline the clinical workflow, although careful validation remains necessary in structurally complex cases such as HCM.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)