Which Method Should I Select for My Legal Research – Doctrinal, Empirical, Multi-Method or Something Else?
Articles
Karan Choudhary
Paris Nanterre University image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-0962
Published 2024-09-16
https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2024.132.10
PDF
HTML

Keywords

legal research
egal research methodology
Legal research methods
Multi-method legal research

How to Cite

Choudhary, K. (2024) “Which Method Should I Select for My Legal Research – Doctrinal, Empirical, Multi-Method or Something Else?”, Teisė, 132, pp. 135–144. doi:10.15388/Teise.2024.132.10.

Abstract

This article scrutinises research methods for conducting research in the discipline of Law. Quality legal research, whether in the form of a research article, a thesis, a dissertation or any other, is a mere consequence of a meticulously planned research methodology. Protagonists of new research methods argue that renaissance in legal methods is needed to ensure the relevancy of Law as a subject in the present times, and also to find meaningful solutions to real life problems concerning Law. Traditionalists, however, vouch for the relevancy and continued importance of the traditional methods in legal research. Upon analysing various research methods, the author finds that the choice of research methods is contingent upon the understanding/perception of Law, and develops a visual representation of that idea. It has also been determined that research methods from social science are also being used in the legal research with the view to make the legal system more effective. The author argues for a multi-method legal research to arrive at more comprehensive output and to solve real life problems concerning Law.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.