Rail Baltica in Latvia: National Effectiveness and Benefit Distribution
Articles
Jānis Kudiņš
Daugavpils University image/svg+xml
Vera Komarova
Daugavpils University image/svg+xml
Edmunds Čižo
Daugavpils University image/svg+xml
Anita Kokarēviča
Riga Stradiņš University image/svg+xml
Published 2026-09-29
https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2026.105.3.3
PDF
HTML

Keywords

Rail Baltica (RB)
corridor-level performance
national effectiveness
benefit distribution
cost–benefit analysis (CBA)
scenario analysis
sensitivity testing
Latvia

How to Cite

Kudiņš, J. et al. (2026) “Rail Baltica in Latvia: National Effectiveness and Benefit Distribution”, Ekonomika, 105(3), pp. 40–57. doi:10.15388/Ekon.2026.105.3.3.

Abstract

Rail Baltica is a flagship Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) corridor project whose positive corridor-level cost–benefit analysis (CBA) indicators do not automatically translate into proportional national welfare gains. Rather than replicating the official CBA, the study applies a methodological inversion based on benefit hierarchy, scenario analysis, and sensitivity testing. Official CBA indicators (NPV, BCR, IRR) are treated as a reference framework, while national outcomes are evaluated through bounded demand and delivery scenarios. Quantitative modelling focuses on passenger time savings as the most stable benefit component, while freight benefits are monetised conservatively by using baseline-anchored utilisation ranges. Freight effects are less robust due to a structural break in East–West transit and declining rail freight baselines. Financing gaps and phased delivery increase exposure to fiscal and timing risk, while environmental gains remain assumption-sensitive. For Latvian decision-makers, the study provides a practical robustness framework centred on node operability, phasing discipline, and demand realisation thresholds to support risk-aware implementation choices.

PDF
HTML

References

Andrić, J. M., Wang, J., & Mohammadi, A. (2024). Determining cost and causes of overruns in infrastructure projects in South Asia. Sustainability, 16(24), 11159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411159

Baerenbold, R. (2023). Reducing risks in megaprojects: The potential of reference class forecasting. Project Leadership and Society, 4(7–8), 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100103

Boira, J. V. (2023). Progress and challenges in the implementation of the Mediterranean Corridor and the TEN-T in Spain: The Port of Valencia. Land, 12(11), 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12111986

Cavallaro, F., Nocera, S., Sommacal, G., & Vergelli, G. (2023). The fare and frequency sensitivity in high-speed rail demand: Empirical evidence from the Italian market. Transportation, 50(5), 1685–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10291-y

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025a). Table TPA020: Passenger traffic (million passengers), 1990–2024. Statistical Database. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/business-sectors/passenger-traffic/tables/tpa020-passenger-traffic-million

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025b). Table TPA030: Passenger turnover (million passenger–kilometres), 1990–2024. Statistical Database. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/business-sectors/passenger-traffic/tables/tpa030-passenger-turnover-million

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025c). Table TRK010: Cargo traffic and cargo turnover by mode of transport, 1980–2024. Statistical Database. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/business-sectors/freight-transport/tables/trk010-cargo-traffic-and-cargo-turnover

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025d). Table TRK030: Cargo traffic by rail, 1993–2024. Statistical Database. https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/business-sectors/freighttransport/tables/trk030-cargo-traffic-rail

European Commission. (2014). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects: Economic appraisal tool for cohesion policy 2014–2020. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guides/2014/guide-to-cost-benefit-analysis-of-investment-projects-for-cohesion-policy-2014-2020

European Commission. (2021). Economic appraisal vademecum 2021–2027: General principles and sector applications. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guides/2021/economic-appraisal-vademecum-2021-2027-general-principles-and-sector-applications

European Commission via Rail Baltica. (2025). European Commission grants €295.5 million to support Rail Baltica’s further development. Railbaltica.org. https://www.railbaltica.org/news/european-commission-grants-e295-5-million-to-support-rail-balticas-further-development/

European Court of Auditors. (2021). Intermodal freight transport: Still a long way to go (Special Report No. 06/2021). https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SR-2021-06

European Environment Agency. (2023). Transport and environment report 2022 (EEA Report No. 14/2023). Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/transport-and-environment-report-2022

European Parliament and the Council. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1315/oj

Eurostat. (2024). Key figures on European transport – 2023 edition. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-key-figures/w/ks-he-23-001

Flyvbjerg, B., & Bester, D. W. (2021). The right projects built right: From the Iron Law of megaproject management to the Hiding Hand. Project Management Journal, 52(5), 474–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211014890

Flyvbjerg, B., & Gardner, D. (2023). How big things get done. Crown Currency.

Håkansson, A. (2023). Military mobility for Europe? How the Russia–Ukraine War changes the strategic rationale for military mobility. Defence Studies, 23(3), 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2023.2213647

Hollweg, C. H., Smith, T., Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2017). Services in global value chains: Driving competitiveness and innovation. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0859-3

Kılınç, G., Kocabıyık, T., & Karaatlı, M. (2023). Baltic Dry Index estimation with NARX neural network model. Ekonomika, 102(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2023.102.1.4

LSM English. (2025). Latvian government approves more cash for Rail Baltica. LSM.lv. https://eng.lsm.lv/article/economy/transport/11.02.2025-latvian-government-approves-more-cash-for-rail-baltica.a587356/

McCann, P. (2023). How have place-based policies evolved to date and what are they for now? Background paper for the OECD–EC High-Level Expert Workshop Series on “Place-Based Policies for the Future” (Workshop 1, 14 April 2023). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/04/how-have-place-based-policies-evolved-to-date-and-what-are-they-for-now_2b350aad/b80f3e4e-en.pdf

Ministry of Transport of Latvia. (2024). Rail Baltica projekta īstenošanai 2024. gadā plānots apgūt 174,7 miljonus eiro. SAM.gov.lv. https://www.sam.gov.lv/lv/jaunums/rail-baltica-projekta-istenosanai-2024-gada-planots-apgut-1747-miljoni-eiro (In Latvian)

Pagliara, F., Henke, I., Russo, L., & Guigon, M. (2022). Is high-speed rail a geographically inclusive system? Evidence from some European countries. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 15(1), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-021-09399-y

Park, D. W. (2021). A review of demand forecasting in transport and its implications for cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 55(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1920/jtep.2021.1.1

Rail Baltica. (2024). Rail Baltica global cost-benefit analysis (Executive Summary). RB Rail AS. https://www.railbaltica.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/RB_CBA_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_0405-1.pdf

State Audit Office of Latvia. (2018). Rail Baltica – Audit summary (Financial Audit Summary No. 2.4.1-15/2018).https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/en/getrevisionfile//uploads/Majaslapa %20ENG/Audit%20report/2018/2.4.1-15_2018/Rail_Baltica_audit_summary.pdf

State Audit Office of Latvia. (2024). Review on the Rail Baltica project (Financial audit summary No. 2.4.1-44/2023). https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/en/audit-summaries/audit-summaries/review-on-the-rail-baltica-project

Voitko, S., Naraievskyi, S., & Trofymenko, O. (2022). Development of energy supply infrastructure based on Industry 4.0 (on the example of Ukraine and Turkey). Ekonomika, 101(2), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2022.101.2.5

Yeboah, E. (2024). The effect of foreign direct investment, domestic investment, and trade on economic growth: Evidence from the Baltic countries. Ekonomika, 103(4), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2024.103.4.8

Zeibote, Z., Balodis, J., Kokarēviča, A., Kudiņš, J., & Čižo, E. (2025). Transportation efficiency in Latvia in the context of economic productivity and environmental sustainability. In I. Kabashkin et al. (Eds.), RelStat 2024, LNNS 1337 (pp. 638–648). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87532-8_57

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.