Santrauka
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Audronė Kučinskienė,
Ciceronas apie vertimą. Ką mums atskleidžia žodžių reikšmės
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 3 (2012): the Classics
-
Adolphe Haberer,
Intertextuality in Theory and Practice
,
Literatūra: T 49 Nr. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Linara Bartkuvienė,
Virginios Woolf šiuolaikinės prozos estetika: formos paieškos apsakyme „Dėmė ant sienos“
,
Literatūra: T 47 Nr. 4 (2005): World Literatures
-
Илья Дементьев,
Оксимирон и Пушкин: опыт интертекстуального анализа альбома «Горгород»
,
Literatūra: T 60 Nr. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Dalia Čiočytė,
Broniaus Krivicko kūrybos žmogus ribinėje situacijoje: literatūrinė Dievo patirtis
,
Literatūra: T 62 Nr. 1 (2020): Literatūra
-
Loreta Jakonytė,
Pierre’o Bourdieu literatūros sociologija
,
Literatūra: T 47 Nr. 1 (2005): Lithuanian Literature
-
Rūta Šlapkauskaitė,
Intertekstinis Margaretos Atwood romano Tarnaitės pasakojimas skaitymas
,
Literatūra: T 46 Nr. 5 (2004): Special Issue
-
Inga Litvinavičienė,
Les aspects sociologiques dans l’oeuvre d’Annie Ernaux
,
Literatūra: T 49 Nr. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Алена-София Ивинская,
Галина Михайлова,
Anos Achmatovos lietuvių poezijos vertimai: kultūrologinis aspektas
,
Literatūra: T 58 Nr. 2 (2016): Russian Literature
-
Małgorzata Kamecka,
L’Histoire et l’identité selon Leïla Sebbar
,
Literatūra: T 61 Nr. 4 (2019): Literature