The Reliability of Positive and Negative Work Reflection Scales: Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis
Brief Reports
Tadas Vadvilavičius
Vytautas Magnus University image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-1959
Published 2025-10-09
https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2026.74.5
PDF
HTML

Keywords

meta-analysis
positive work reflection
negative work reflection
reliability

How to Cite

Vadvilavičius, T. (2025). The Reliability of Positive and Negative Work Reflection Scales: Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis. Psichologija, 74, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2026.74.5

Abstract

Positive and Negative work reflection are important constructs in the field of organizational psychology. To measure these constructs, reliable measures are needed. In order to summarize the findings from different studies, a reliability generalization meta-analysis was performed. A literature search in six databases was conducted. In total, 216 records were found, while 26 papers were included in the analysis. Positive and Negative work reflection scales by Fritz and Sonnentag (2005) and Binnewies et al. (2009) were analyzed. Analysis revealed that internal consistency varied from 0.90 to 0.93. Additionally, the region in which a study was conducted moderated part of the results.

PDF
HTML
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)