Assessment of Social Protection Measures and Institutional Trust in the Context of Social Resilience
Articles
Tautvydas Vencius
Vilnius University image/svg+xml
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-1993
Published 2026-11-10
https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2026.33.5
PDF
HTML

Keywords

social resilience
individuals without labour income
social protection
trust in institutions

How to Cite

Vencius, T. (2026). Assessment of Social Protection Measures and Institutional Trust in the Context of Social Resilience. Socialinė Teorija, Empirija, Politika Ir Praktika, 33, 60-76. https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2026.33.5

Funding data

Abstract

In recent years, increasing attention has been devoted to the concept of social resilience not only in Lithuania’s strategic policy documents but also in reports published by international organizations and in the academic literature. Social protection, institutional capacity to respond effectively to various crises, and public trust in institutions are among the key dimensions of social resilience. By using recent empirical data, this article aims to assess the accessibility of social protection measures, trust in public institutions, and knowledge of available assistance in times of crisis among individuals without labour income, while examining these aspects within the context of social resilience. The findings reveal that more than half of respondents without labour income (including unemployed persons, pensioners, and persons with disabilities) evaluate the accessibility of social protection measures as average, poor, or very poor. Further analysis indicates that these assessments are primarily associated with bureaucratic and administrative barriers, as well as low levels of trust in public institutions. Moreover, a substantial proportion of vulnerable respondents express limited confidence in the government’s ability to ensure the provision of essential services during crises and report lower levels of trust in institutions operating in the fields of social protection, justice, and other areas.

PDF
HTML

References

Abedi, S., Sajadzadeh, H., & Khanmohammadi, M. (2025). An in-depth literature review for developing a conceptual model of social resilience against disasters triggered by natural hazards. Natural Hazards, 121(10), 11223–11273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07213-3

Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465

Adomavičienė, A., Subotovič, A., Baltutė, R., Dudutytė, A., Dilytė-Kotenko, A., Noreikė, V., Širvinskaitė, I., Kreivėnaitė, I., Avin Ileri, A. (2025). Skurdas ir socialinė atskirtis 2025 (Leidinys Nr. 3(7)). Nacionalinis skurdo mažinimo organizacijų tinklas. https://www.smtinklas.lt/wp-content/uploads/simple-file-list/Metine-skurdo-ir-socialines-atskirties-apzvalga/Skurdo-ir-socialines-atskirties-apzvalga-2025.pdf

Blaževičė, I. (2021). Bendruomenių atsparumo sukrėtimams socioekonominis modelis [Daktaro disertacija, Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas]. https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/95703

Börjesson, A., & Karlsson, L. (2025). Exploring the resilience of social insurance systems in the light of endogenous welfare austerity: Insights from Sweden. International Social Security Review, 78(2–3), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.70002

Both, N., & Tessier, L. (2025). Supporting coordinated approaches across health and social protection systems to enhance resilience. International Social Security Review, 78(2–3), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.70008

Česnuitytė, V., Guogis, A., Bernotas, D., Grincevičiūtė, I. (2022). Socialinės paramos išmokų nepaėmimo priežastys, mastas ir identifikavimo metodika Lietuvos savivaldybėse ir visoje šalyje (non-take-up): galutinė ataskaita. Mykolo Romerio universitetas. https://socmin.lrv.lt/uploads/socmin/documents/files/veiklos-sritys/seima/pinigine-parama/NON-TAKE-UP%20GALUTIN%C4%96%20ATASKAITA.pdf

Dagdeviren, H., Donoghue, M., & Promberger, M. (2016). Resilience, Hardship and Social Conditions. Journal of Social Policy, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941500032X

European Commission. (2025). Foresight report 2025: Resilience 2.0 : empowering the EU to thrive amid turbulence and uncertainty. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2792/6378524

Vencius, T., Gabnytė, V., & Navickė, J. (2020). The Benefit non-take-up in the Context of Cash Social Assistance Reform in Lithuania. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 21, 96–121. https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2020.25

Gaidys, V. (2016). Lietuvos gyventojų pasitikėjimas valstybės institucijomis: panašumai ir skirtumai In M. Taljūnaitė (Ed.), Lietuvos gyventojų grupių socialinė kaita (p. 48–65). Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.

Gevorgianienė, V., Šumskienė, E., Genienė, R., Žalimienė, L., Dunajevas, E. (2024). Ribų valdymas asmeninių socialinių paslaugų erdvėje: Samprata, iššūkiai ir galimybės. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 29, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.15388/STEPP.2024.29.4

Holland‐Szyp, C., & Lind, J. (2025). Social protection and resilience in protracted crises. International Social Security Review, 78(2–3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.70000

Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126

Kovács, B., Polese, A., Morris, J. (2017). Adjusting social welfare and social policy in Central and Eastern Europe: growth, crisis and recession. In P. Kennett & N. Lendvai-Bainton (Eds.), Handbook of European social policy (pp. 194–217). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476466.00021

Kumlin, S. (2004). The Personal and the Political. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980274

Kumlin, S. (2007). Overloaded or Undermined? European Welfare States in the Face of Performance Dissatisfaction. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), he Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Cleavages, and Orientations (pp. 80–116). Stanford University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3235399

Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas. (2025). Valstybės pažangos strategija „Lietuvos ateities vizija „Lietuva 2050“. https://lrv.lt/media/viesa/saugykla/2023/12/pkvNdKVl0fk.pdf

Liou, J., Jiao, Z., Wei, K., & Peng, Y. (2025). Social security and economic resilience—A new structural economics perspective. Economic Analysis and Policy, 88, 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.026

Nacionalinė NVO koalicija. (2025, gruodžio 8). Lietuvos visuomenės pasitikėjimas nevyriausybinėmis organizacijomis auga, tačiau vis dar pusė gyventojų neturi nuomonės. https://www.ngo.lt/lietuvos-visuomenes-pasitikejimas-nevyriausybinemis-organizacijomis-auga-taciau-vis-dar-puse-gyventoju-neturi-nuomones/

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Fast-tracking Net Zero by Building Climate and Economic Resilience: A Summary for Policymakers. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f2c22c96-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025a). More Effective Social Protection for Stronger Economic Growth: Main Findings from the 2024 OECD Risks that Matter Survey. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3947946a-en

Pereirinha, J. A. C., & Pereira, E. (2021). Social resilience and welfare systems under COVID-19: A European comparative perspective. Global Social Policy, 21(3), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181211012946

Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., & Teorell, J. (2010). Quality of government, political power and the welfare state (QoG Working Paper Series 2010:6). The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/39061

Skučienė, D. (2026). Socialiai pažeidžiamų grupių atsparumas dezinformacijai ir priemonės jį didinti. Vilniaus universitetas. https://www.fsf.vu.lt/dokumentai/mokslo_rezultatu_platforma/Socialiai_paz%CC%8Ceidz%CC%8Ciamu%CC%A8_grupiu%CC%A8_DS.pdf

Skučienė, D., Brazienė, R., & Vencius, T. (2025). Resilience of Socially Vulnerable Populations to Disinformation in Lithuania: The Role of the Welfare State. Social Inclusion, 13, 10100. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10100

Skučienė, D., Denisenko, V. (2025). Socialiai pažeidžiamų grupių atsparumas dezinformacijai. Vilniaus universitetas. https://www.fsf.vu.lt/dokumentai/mokslo_rezultatu_platforma/socialiai_pazeidziamos_grupes_2025_04Epdf.pdf

Ulriksen, M. S., & Plagerson, S. (2023). Social protection and state‐citizen relations: A review of the literature. Social Policy & Administration, 57(6), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12959

Vyriausybės strateginės analizės centras (STRATA). (2025). Socialinio atsparumo sampratų apžvalga. https://lrv.lt/public/canonical/1761741273/537722/Socialinio%20atsparumo%20samprat%C5%B3%20ap%C5%BEvalga.pdf

Vyriausybės strateginės analizės centras (STRATA). (2026). Socialinio atsparumo kelrodis. https://lrv.lt/public/canonical/1783067023/657072/Socialinio%20atsparumo%20kelrodis.pdf

Vyriausybės strateginės analizės centras (STRATA). (2026a). Ateities poreikius stiprinti socialinį atsparumą sąlygojančių tendencijų apžvalga. https://lrv.lt/public/canonical/1774335548/598626/Socialinio%20atsparumo%20tendencij%C5%B3%20ap%C5%BEvalga%20final.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)