Santrauka
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Julija Snezko,
«Я камыши пропел, как до меня не пели...»: семантика болота в поэзии К. Д. Бальмонта
,
Literatūra: T 61 Nr. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Jovita Dikmonienė,
Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra
,
Literatūra: T 49 Nr. 3 (2007): the Classics
-
Nijolė Juchnevičienė,
Moterų gyvenimai Plutarcho Gyvenimuose
,
Literatūra: T 62 Nr. 3 (2020): Antikos kultūros ir jos recepcijos tyrimai
-
Skirmantas Knieža,
Tarp tropų ir pragmatikos: Pasikalbėjimo lenko su lietuviu retorinis aspektas
,
Literatūra: T 61 Nr. 3 (2019): Studies of Ancient Culture and Its Reception
-
Инга Видугирите,
ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ТЕКСТ РУССКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ И ВИЛЬНЮССКИЙ ТЕКСТ ЛИТОВСКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ: ЕЩЕ РАЗ ОБ АНАЛИТИЧЕСКОМ ПОТЕНЦИАЛЕ КОНЦЕПЦИИ В. Н. ТОПОРОВА
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 2 (2013): Russian Literature
-
Marijus Šidlauskas,
Absurdo idėjos transformacijos mirusio Dievo pasaulyje
,
Literatūra: T 59 Nr. 1 (2017): Literature
-
Valérie Etter,
Atminties pareiga ir šiuolaikinis menas: Christianas Boltanskis ir Jochenas Gerzas
,
Literatūra: T 59 Nr. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Viktė Tamošaitytė,
Klasikinės ir vėlyvosios Antikos bruožai Ausonijaus poemoje "Kupidono nukryžiavimas"
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 3 (2013): the Classics
-
Eleonora Lassan,
Контрапункт как содержательно-стилистический прием в интермедиальном жанре (о «Соло на флейте» Виктора Шендеровича)
,
Literatūra: T 61 Nr. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Dalia Čiočytė,
Teodicėjiniai motyvai lietuvių literatūroje: universalumas ir specifika
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 1 (2012): Lithuanian Literature