ON THE ORIGIN OF SOME GENITIVE DUAL FORMS OF PERSONAL PRONOUNS
Articles
Albertas Rosinas
Vilnius University image/svg+xml
Published 2026-01-28
https://doi.org/10.15388/Baltistica.41.3.1150
PDF

Keywords

dviskaita
įvardis
kilmininkas

How to Cite

Rosinas, A. (tran.) (2026) “ON THE ORIGIN OF SOME GENITIVE DUAL FORMS OF PERSONAL PRONOUNS”, Baltistica, 41(3), pp. 401–405. doi:10.15388/Baltistica.41.3.1150.

Abstract

The article deals with the origin of the genitive dual forms mùma and jùma, which are personal pronouns used in the southern West Aukštaitian subdialect as well as in East Prussian Lithuanian texts and subdialects. Some scholars argue that the above forms are old dative-instrumental forms which acquired a genitive meaning in prepositional constructions only after the prepositions which govern the dative began to govern the genitive, i.e. when prie + dative → prie + genitive.

The article puts forward the idea that the said dative forms obtained a genitive meaning long before the change in the prepositional government. This became possible by transforming the possessive construction with the subject in the dative + būti into ‘dative’ + noun: Mùma yra pamotė (‘She is a stepmother to us’) → Mùma pamotė (‘Our stepmother’), cf. Aš turiu pamotę (‘I have a stepmother’) → Mano pamotė (‘My stepmother’). The change of the meaning of these forms could also have been influenced by the atonic singular forms mi, ti, si used in the genitive, dative and accusative meanings. Had this change of meaning not occurred in an adjectival position before the change in the prepositional government, the constructions *iš muma, *nuo muma would hardly have arisen.

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>