Santrauka
[straipsnis ir santrauka anglų kalba, santrauka lietuvių kalba]
Autentiškumas yra pamatinis siekis skaitmeninių išteklių ilgalaikio išsaugojimo srityje; kita vertus, autentiškumo tikrinimas – kompleksinė užduotis, kuriai įgyvendinti reikalinga proveniencija, kaip patikimumo prielaida. Atsižvelgiant į tai, labai svarbu apibrėžti pagrindinius šio proceso elementus, sudarančius šios sudėtingos koncepcijos pagrindą. Pagrindinis straipsnio tikslas – nustatyti autentiškumo valdymo procesą skaitmeninio išsaugojimo kontekste: identifikuoti semantinius elementus, užtikrinančius ilgalaikio išsaugojimo funkcijas ir skaitmeninių objektų patikimumą bei funkcinį sistemų suderinamumą, t. y. galimybę institucijoms keistis duomenimis. Straipsnyje pateikiami pirmojo tyrimo etapo rezultatai: autentiškumo ir proveniencijos turinio aprėptis, užtikrinanti pagrindines ilgalaikio išsaugojimo funkcijas ir funkcinį sistemų suderinamumą. Straipsnyje, taikant Europos Sąjungos 2–3–6 elektroninės leidybos pridedamosios vertės kūrimo koncepcinį požiūrį, analizuojami autentiškumo ir proveniencijos modeliai ir standartai, taip pat vertinama pridedamoji EUROPEANOS ir VEPIS vertė autentiškumo ir proveniencijos požiūriu, kuri yra grindžiama atitiktimi analizuotiems standartams ir modeliams, naudojamiems šiose sistemose.
Metodologija. Taikant Europos Sąjungos 2–3–6 elektroninės leidybos pridedamosios vertės koncepciją ir remiantis kokybine mokslinės literatūros analize, tyrime konceptualizuojamas turinio kūrimo procesas ilgalaikio išsaugojimo informacinėse sistemose, susijęs su autentiškumo ir proveniencijos struktūros ir prasmės nustatymu. Taikant šį metodą, buvo nustatyta autentiškumo ir proveniencijos turinio aprėptis.
Bibliografinės nuorodos
APARSEN (2012). D24.1 Report on Authenticity and Plan for Interoperable Authenticity Evaluation System. http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/downloads/2014/06/APARSEN-REP-D24_1-01-2_5_incURN.pdf
BUNEMAN, Peter, SANJEV Khanna and WANG-CHIEV Tan. Why and Were: A Characterization of Data Provenance, https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&context=cis_papers.
CAPLAN, P. (2009). Understanding PREMIS. https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/understanding-premis.pdf
CCSDS – Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). https://web.archive.org/web/20131020200910/http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf
CHARLES, V., Isaac, A. (2015). Enhancing the Europeana Data Model (EDM). https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Publications/EDM_WhitePaper_17062015.pdf.
CRMdig: Model for provenance metadata. Version 3.2.1, April, 2016, http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/CRMext/CRMdig/docs/CRMdig_v3.2.1.pdf.
DAPPERT, A., ENDERS, M. (2010). Digital Preservation Metadata Standards, In ISO: Information Standards Quarterly, 22:2 (2010): 5-13, http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/4299/isqv22no2.pdf.
DLM Forum Foundation (2011). Modular Requirements for Records Systems (MoReq2010). https://www.moreq.info/files/moreq2010_vol1_v1_1_en.pdf
DOERR, M. (2009). An Ontological Approach to Digital Preservation Metadata. ICS-FORTH May 23, 2009. http://ww.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/carpar_for_Prague.ppt
DOERR, M., Theodoridou, M. (2011). CRMdig: A Generic Digital Provenance Model for Scientific Observation, in 3rd USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance (TaPP ‘11).
DROGE, E., et al. (2015). DM2E, ICP-PSP-297274, Digitised Manuscripts to Europeana, Technical specification. https://dm2e.eu/files/DM2E_Model_V1.2.pdf
European Commission, DG XIII, Andersen Consulting, (1996). Strategic Developments for the European Publishing Industry towards the Year 2000. http://www.echo.lu/elpub2/en/exengl.pdf
Europeana (2013). Europeana Data Model Primer. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Primer_130714.pdf
Europeana (2017). Definition of the Europeana Data Model v5.2.8 06/10/2017. At: https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation//EDM_Definition_v5.2.8_102017.pdf
Europeana (2017). Europeana Data Model – Mapping Guidelines v2.4. https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Mapping_Guidelines_v2.4_102017.pdf
Europeana (2013). Extending the Europeana Licencing Framework. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/extending-the-europeana-licensing-framework
FACTOR, M., HENIS, E., NAOR, D., RABINOVICI-COHEN, S., RESHEF, P., RONEN, S. (2009). Authenticity and provenance in long term Digital preservation: modeling and implementation in preservation aware storage. http://usenix.org/event/tapp09/tech/full_papers/factor/factor_html/
GAVRILIS, D. DALLAS, C., ANGELIS, S. (2013). A Curation-Oriented Thematic Aggregator. In: Aalberg T., Papatheodorou C., Dobreva M., Tsakonas G., Farrugia C.J. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8092, https://
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_13
GIARETTA, D. (2011). Advanced Digital Preservation. Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York e-ISBN 978-3-642-16809-3. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16809-3
GROTH, P. et al. (2012). Requirements for Provenance on the Web. In International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol. 7, No. 1, https://www.isi.edu/~gil/papers/groth-etal-ijdc12.pdf
GUERCIO, M., SALZA, (2012). Managing Authenticity through the Digital Resource Lifecycle. In Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries IRCDL 2012: Digital Libraries and Archives pp. 249–260, 2013. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-35834-0_25
InterPARES 3 Project (2009). InterPARES 2 Project Chain of Preservation (COP) Model Metadata. http://www.interpares.org/ip2/display_file.cfm?doc=ip2_cop-model_metadata_v1.0.pdf
InterPARES 3 Project, TEAM Canada (2016). General Study 15 – Application Profile For Authenticity Metadata: General study Report. V.2.3. http://www.interpares.org/ip3/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_canada_gs15_final_report.pdf
International Organization for Standardization (2016). ISO 15489-1:2016. Information and documentation – Records management. https://www.iso.org/standard/62542.html
LAMB, D., PRANDONI, C., DACIDSON, J., DCC (2009). http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/technology-watch-papers/caspar
MOREAU, L. et al. (2011). The Open Provenance Model Core Specification (v1.1), In Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 27 (2), Issue 6. P. 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2010.07.005
National Archives of Australia (2008). Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard version 2.0. http://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/managing-information-and-records/describing/metadata/AGRKMS/index.aspx
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata. Version 3.0. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf
ROGERS, C. A literature review of authenticity of records in digital systems from ‘machine-readable’ to records in the cloud (2016). http://oaji.net/articles/2017/3932-1484337719.pdf
TENNIS, J. T., ROGERS, C. (2012). Authenticity Metadata and the IPAM: Progress toward the InterPARES Application Profile. In Proc. Int’l Conf. on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. The Kuching Proceedings. http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3662
The InterPARES 2 Project Dictionary (2018). http://www.interpares.org/ip2/display_file.cfm?
doc=ip2_dictionary.pdf&CFID=15051643&CFTOKEN=77329071
VEPIS Techninis aprašymas (Specifikacija) (2014). Nr.V2.0.
W3C (2013). Provenance Working Group, https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Main_Page
W3C (2013). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology, W3C Recommendation 30 April 2013. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/#description-starting-point-terms
W3C Provenance Incubator Group (2015). Overview of Provenance on the Web. https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/images/0/02/Provenance-XG-Overview.pdf
